The Del Monte Kenya Tax Case: Key Insights from a Sh6.76 Billion Transfer Pricing Dispute
The Del Monte Kenya Limited tax dispute has become one of
the most consequential transfer pricing cases in Kenya’s recent history. While
public attention initially focused on a Sh1.76 billion assessment, the case in
fact exposes a total tax risk of approximately Sh6.76 billion, arising from
multi-year transfer pricing audits by the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA).
Beyond the headlines, this case offers important lessons for multinational enterprises operating in Kenya.
1. Understanding the Full Sh6.76 Billion Exposure
The Del Monte case is not a single-year dispute. It
comprises two separate but related tax assessments arising from similar
transfer pricing issues applied across multiple years:
- Sh1.76
billion – relating to the 2018 year of income, which was the primary
subject of the Tax Appeals Tribunal (TAT) decision.
- Sh4.959
billion – relating to the 2019–2021 years of income, arising from
follow-up assessments based on the same pricing model.
When combined, the total tax demand stands at approximately
Sh6.76 billion, which explains why the matter is widely referred to as the “Sh7
billion Del Monte tax case.”
Key takeaway:
A single transfer pricing model can generate compounding exposure across
several years if not corrected early.
2. What Triggered the KRA Adjustments?
KRA’s assessments focused on related-party transactions,
including:
- Pricing
of exports to offshore group marketing entities
- Payment
of management, software, and procurement fees to affiliates
- Interest
deductions claimed on intra-group loans
KRA concluded that these arrangements shifted profits out of
Kenya and did not reflect arm’s-length outcomes.
If you'd like to talk to a tax and finance expert, you can click here to book a free consultation appointment
3. Tribunal’s Core Findings
The Tax Appeals Tribunal upheld KRA’s position on several
fundamental principles:
a) Substance Over Legal Form
The Tribunal found that Del Monte Kenya undertook
significant operational, commercial, and risk-bearing activities locally. As
such, it could not be treated as a low-risk or routine entity earning minimal
returns.
Lesson:
Tax outcomes follow economic reality, not how entities are labelled in
contracts.
b) Arm’s-Length Pricing Must Reflect Functions and Risks
The mark-ups applied to inter-company transactions were
considered insufficient given the scale and complexity of Del Monte Kenya’s
operations.
Lesson:
Transfer pricing methods must align with what the local entity actually
does, not group-wide assumptions.
c) Documentation Is Not a Formality
Several related-party charges were disallowed due to weak or
missing third-party evidence and inadequate benchmarking.
Lesson:
Transfer pricing documentation must be defensible, contemporaneous, and
supported by reliable comparables.
d) Intra-Group Financing Faces Heightened Scrutiny
Interest deductions were rejected where Del Monte could not
demonstrate that loan terms were comparable to independent market financing.
Lesson:
Related-party loans must be priced and structured as if dealing with an
independent lender.
4. Why This Case Matters for Businesses in Kenya
The Del Monte decision signals a clear enforcement direction
by KRA:
- Transfer
pricing audits are increasingly multi-year and high value
- Profit-shifting
allegations will be pursued aggressively
- Tribunal
decisions can validate assessments for subsequent years
- Tax
exposure can escalate rapidly if issues remain unresolved
This case reinforces that transfer pricing risk is no longer
theoretical—it translates into real, material liabilities.
If you'd like to talk to a tax and finance expert, you can click here to book a free consultation appointment
5. RWK Practical Insights: What Taxpayers Should Learn
Businesses with related-party transactions should take
proactive steps:
- Review
transfer pricing models to ensure they reflect Kenyan functions, assets,
and risks
- Strengthen
benchmarking studies and supporting documentation
- Reassess
intra-group loans and interest rates for arm’s-length compliance
- Adopt
a multi-year risk perspective, not a year-by-year approach
- Consider
Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs) to manage uncertainty
Final Thought
The Del Monte case is a reminder that transfer pricing is a
strategic tax risk, not a compliance checkbox. Early review, proper
documentation, and alignment with economic substance can mean the difference
between routine audits and multi-billion-shilling disputes.
RWK Africa continues to advise clients on transfer pricing reviews, audit defense, and dispute resolution in this evolving enforcement environment
For support and advice, contact RWK Africa — your partner in tax compliance.
Follow Us on Our Socials for more insights and also do not forget to subscribe to our newsletter and both our Whatsapp and YouTube channel!
Whatsapp Group Facebook, X , TikTok ,Instagram , YouTube
Contact Us:
Email: info@rwkafrica.com
Phone: +254 728897429
Website: www.rwkafrica.com
Stay informed. Stay compliant. RWK Africa – Legal Clarity. Policy Insight.

Comments
Post a Comment